SuperCitizen
civic os · v1.0

Every ten years, after the census, states redraw congressional and state legislative districts. Most states task their legislatures with this; a growing minority use independent or bipartisan commissions. Computer-aided drawing has made partisan gerrymandering far more precise — districts can be optimized to "pack" opposition voters into a few districts and "crack" them across many others.

The Supreme Court ruled in Rucho v. Common Cause (2019) that partisan gerrymandering is non-justiciable in federal courts, leaving the issue to states. Racial gerrymandering remains justiciable under the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment.

Reform proposals include independent redistricting commissions, mathematical fairness criteria (compactness, partisan symmetry), and federal legislation to set national standards.

Spectrum of framings

How adherents on each side of the conventional left / center / right spectrum frame this issue — written so each camp would recognize the framing as charitable.

left

Many progressives push for independent commissions and federal anti-gerrymandering legislation, viewing partisan map-drawing as voter suppression.

center

Good-government reformers across parties favor independent commissions and mathematical fairness standards.

right

Some conservatives accept partisan map-drawing as legitimate political activity protected by the Constitution; others support nonpartisan reform.

Perspectives

Each perspective is presented in terms its advocates would recognize, with the concerns they treat as paramount. None is endorsed.

  • Independent-commission reformers

    Voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around. Independent commissions in states like California, Michigan, and Arizona have produced more competitive maps.

    • Removing self-interested legislators from line-drawing
    • Producing competitive districts
    • Reducing extreme partisan outcomes
  • Status-quo / political defenders

    Districting is inherently political and was assigned to legislatures by the Constitution. Mathematical "fairness" is unattainable and commissions just shift partisanship to unaccountable appointees.

    • Constitutional assignment of districting to legislatures
    • Accountability of map-drawers
    • Uncertainty about commission neutrality
  • Proportional / multi-member alternatives

    Single-member districts make gerrymandering possible at all. Multi-member districts with proportional voting (e.g. STV) eliminate the line-drawing problem.

    • Structural fix vs procedural fix
    • Compatibility with federal law
    • Political feasibility of multi-member reform

Voices on this issue1

Commonly-cited public figures who have taken a position on this issue. Grouped by their conventional left/center/right lean. Tap a voice to see their full position record.

Related lessons

Discuss this issue with the Coach →