Recent Supreme Court decisions have significantly constrained EPA authority:
- West Virginia v. EPA (2022): Used "major questions doctrine" to strike down power-sector emissions regulation.
- Sackett v. EPA (2023): Narrowed Clean Water Act jurisdiction over wetlands.
- Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024): Overturned Chevron deference, requiring courts to independently interpret ambiguous statutes.
Pending fights include power-sector greenhouse-gas standards, vehicle emissions standards, methane rules, PFAS regulation, and Endangered Species Act listings.
Defenders argue EPA needs broad authority to address evolving environmental threats Congress wrote statutes to address. Critics argue agency rule-making has expanded beyond statutory authorization, requiring judicial correction.